Abstract
As far as I know, the first description of slow lightning occurs in your issue of November 7. It must be very rare, for I have never met any one who would readily believe in its existence. I write to testify to the accuracy of Mr. Crawford's description, though I have not seen it quite as slow as the flash which he timed. The best example that I ever saw was in a storm over London some eighteen years ago. A thick stream poured down, in the sort of curve which liquid takes from a kettle, and was then slowly joined by a similar stream from the opposite direction, the united stream then continuing its slow course downwards. I was not where I could see the end of it. The peculiarities—the breadth of the streams, and their deliberate motion—could scarcely be an optical delusion. The streams did not appear to me as “chains.”
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BRIDGES, R. Slow Lightning. Nature 53, 31–32 (1895). https://doi.org/10.1038/053031b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/053031b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.