Abstract
THE above-named theorem, which appeared in the Phil. Mag. for August 1870, much as it is now used in connection with the kinetic theory of gases, received little, if any, attention in England for some time after its introduction. Apparently the theorem was accepted without hesitation or discussion, and, as far as I can learn, neither on its first introduction or since has it received any adverse criticism, or, in fact, any criticism whatsoever. My object in writing this letter is, in the first place, to direct attention to the arguments used by Clausius to establish his theorem, which appear to me to be unsound, and secondly, by applying a simple test case, to show that the theorem itself is not true.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BASEVI, C. Clausius' Virial Theorem. Nature 52, 413–414 (1895). https://doi.org/10.1038/052413c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/052413c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.