Abstract
THE remarkable differences of opinion as to what the H-theorem is, and how it can be proved, show how necessary is the discussion elicited by my letter on the oversight in Dr. Watson's proof. Each of the four authorities who have replied takes a different view.
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
CULVERWELL, E. Boltzmann's Minimum Theorem.. Nature 51, 246 (1895). https://doi.org/10.1038/051246a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/051246a0
This article is cited by
-
From thermodynamics to philosophical tradition: Pierre Duhem’s research between 1891 and 1896
Lettera Matematica (2017)
-
?Will someone say exactly what the H-theorem proves?? A study of Burbury's Condition A and Maxwell's Proposition II
Archive for History of Exact Sciences (1994)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.