Abstract
WHILE engaged on his classical experiments Hertz noticed that the appearance of the discharge between the two terminals of the oscillator was greatly changed upon the spark gap being illuminated by the light coming from another spark. This change was not due to an electrical action of the sparks, for it was equally well produced by other sources of light, such as the electric arc and burning magnesium, while all effect immediately ceased on interposing a plate of glass. Since the time when the above observations were made many experimentalists have investigated this subject and have obtained rather divergent results. In most cases the source of light employed has been the electric arc formed between carbon rods, though, with a view to increase the proportion of ultra-violet rays emitted, Biohat and Blondlot used carbon rods with aluminium cores, while Righi used a zinc rod for one terminal. Other observers have used the spark of an induction coil passing between terminals of copper, zinc, or aluminium. While Hertz had only noticed that the illumination of the discharging knobs increased the facility with which sparks passed, Wiedemann, Ebert and Hallwachs found that it was only when the negative terminal was illuminated that this effect took place. More recent observations by Branly have led to this view being modified, for he finds that on illuminating a piece of zinc by the sparks of a large induction coil produced between aluminium terminals, if the source of light is sufficiently near to the plate, the loss of charge is nearly as rapid for a positive as for a negative charge. On increasing the distance between the spark and the charged plate, the decrease in the rate of loss of charge is much more rapid for positive than for negative charges, and thus at some distance from the source of light the negative charge is the only one which is appreciably affected. Hence radiation of certain kinds increases the rate at which a positively charged body loses its charge, just as in the case of a negative charge, but the rays which are active in the case of positive electricity are absorbed by even a small thickness of air, while those rays which are unabsorbed are still able to accelerate the discharge of a negatively charged body.
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
W., W. The Effects of Light on the Electrical Discharge. Nature 49, 226–227 (1894). https://doi.org/10.1038/049226a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/049226a0