Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Miscellany
  • Published:

Notes

Abstract

IT seems almost incredible that the Treasury should think of stopping the publication of the Kew Bulletin simply because it does not quite pay its own expenses. The periodical, as our readers know, is one of high value, both from the scientific and the industrial point of view, and, if the Treasury persists in the design attributed to it, something ought soon to be said on the subject in Parliament by the scientific members. The Times has argued strongly against the proposed step, and the view it has expressed will be shared by all who are capable of forming an intelligent opinion on the subject. It cannot be expected that a very large number of copies of the Bulletin will be sold, as it is really more useful to our colonial Governments than to individuals either here or in the colonies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Notes. Nature 45, 494–497 (1892). https://doi.org/10.1038/045494b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/045494b0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing