Abstract
“DARWIN'S LIFE AND LETTERS” are now public property, and as reference to vol. iii. p. 242, shows—what nearly every scientific man knew—that the late Sir Wyville Thomson was distinctly anti-Darwinian in his views, it follows that the Duke of Argyll's inferences as to his reasons for urging Mr. Murray's withdrawal of the “new coral-reef theory” paper from the Royal Society of Edinburgh is illogical, not to say absurd. In justice to Sir Wyville's memory and in support of Mr. Bonney's surmise (NATURE, November 24, p. 77) I wish to state that, talking with Sir Wyville about “Murray's new theory,” I asked what objection he had to its being brought before the public? The answer simply was: he considered that the grounds of the theory had not as yet been sufficiently investigated or sufficiently corroborated, and that therefore any immature, dogmatic publication of it would do less than little service either to science or to the author of the paper.
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
AN OLD PUPIL OF WYVILLE THOMSON's “The Conspiracy of Silence”. Nature 37, 200 (1887). https://doi.org/10.1038/037200b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/037200b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.