Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

[Letters to Editor]

Abstract

I HAVE not changed any of my views; but Mr. Dixon appears to change his within the limits of two consecutive sentences. For, immediately after his strong protest against my statement that he has attempted to explain the causes of variation, he complains of my want of fairness in not acknowledging the adequacy of the “evolutionistic agents” which he has suggested as “the causes of variation.” With this specimen of Mr. Dixon's method of discussion before them, your readers may be able to sympathise with the failure which seems to have attended my efforts at expounding his essay.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ROMANES, G. [Letters to Editor]. Nature 33, 128–129 (1885). https://doi.org/10.1038/033128f0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/033128f0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing