Abstract
I HAD once a very unusual opportunity of observing accurately the flight of buzzards, from the summit of Acro-Corinthus. As this unique natural fortress rises sheer from the plain, on the side toward Attica, to the height of eighteen or nineteen hundred feet, a group of these birds, hanging at that height above the surface, were thus brought in a line with the eye. I could detect the minutest movement of wings or tail. Again and again there were considerable intervals, of many seconds' duration, during which one bird and another would hang, with pinions horizontally outstretched, absolutely motionless, neither descending nor drifting, but as if his balance in the air were one of delicately adjusted equipoise. And when, by a just perceptible movement of wing, he stirred again, it seemed rather to be to change his position than that he needed any kind or degree of effort to maintain it. The kestrel is an unfortunately chosen bird for Mr. Hubert Airy's observation, because though it hangs for a minute or two over the same spot watching its prey, it is always “by short and rapid motion of its wings”; from which fanning motion it has acquired, I think, its popular name of windhover, and not because, as Mr. Airy supposes, it is upborne by the wind. But were my Corintbian buzzards uphorue by the wind? There was none. The day was one of dead calm. No doubt of necessity there was some upward current of air from the sun-warmed surface of the ground by which the birds profited; but if at all sufficient to sustain them, their actual gravity, when in that position and so willing it (by which I mean nothing so absurd as that gravitation can be counteracted by the vis vitœ, but that by inflating its lungs, and perhaps suspending its respiration, the bird may have the power at will of lessening its comparative weight in the air), must be very near to that of the atmosphere around and underneath them. It is evident that Mr. Airy could only claim my observation as being in favour of his theory if there had been a breeze from Attica striking against the face of the citadel. There was none perceptible; and I drew the attention of my companions to the curious problem presented by such an ease of flight.
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
CECIL, H. Hovering of Birds. Nature 27, 388 (1883). https://doi.org/10.1038/027388b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/027388b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.