Abstract
DR. HOEK'S complaint in NATURE, vol. xviii. p. 569, that not much care had been taken in the record as to zoological papers published in the Netherlands in 1875 and 1876, doubtless appears well grounded to himself from his locally restricted view, but, when analysed, is scarcely of sufficient importance to call for more than an expression of regret that a certain percentage of omission and error must inevitably occur in any large undertaking. No one of the recorders fancies that his work is complete, and the omissions of any one year are constantly supplemented in the following volumes, our best thanks being given to those who will take the trouble to put us right.
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
RYE, E. The Zoological Record. Nature 18, 615 (1878). https://doi.org/10.1038/018615d0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/018615d0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.