Abstract
I HAVE no intention of discussing the beautiful experiments of Prof. A. M. Meyer on floating magnets; but as a privately expressed opinion of mine has appeared in NATURE, vol. xviii. p. 260, I feel bound to defend it. The mutual repulsion of the vertical floating magnets varies nearly inversely as the fourth power of the distance at great distances, and nearly inversely as the square at small distances. The horizontal attraction of the magnet, held vertically over the water, varies nearly inversely as the fourth power at very great distances. At a certain moderate distance it reaches a maximum, and close to the centre it varies directly as the distance. It is easy to see that variations of the magnetisation of the lengths of the magnets, and of the distance of the large magnet from the surface of the water, may render configurations stable which would, under different conditions, be forms of unstable equilibrium. Prof. Meyer thinks that the configuration can never be stable. It is easy to see that it is a form of equilibrium, and in fact that any given size of hexagon will be brought into equilibrium by placing the large magnet at a suitable distance. It may, therefore, be in equilibrium when the floating magnets are on the circle of maximum attraction of the fixed magnet. But, in this case, the equilibrium is stable; for work would be expended in altering in any way the position of any one of the floating magnets. If this one is carried away from the others they repel it less, and it will be brought back; if it is carried nearer to the others they repel it more, and again it will be brought back.
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
PIERCE, C. Floating Magnets. Nature 18, 381 (1878). https://doi.org/10.1038/018381a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/018381a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.