Abstract
1. IT is an admitted fact that the age of the sun's heat will not harmonise with the evidence of geology, on the supposition that the heat was solely derived from the approach of matter under the action of gravity. Dr. James Croll, in dealing with, this question in a recent number of NATURE,1 has suggested the existence of a previous proper motion in the colliding matter that formed the sun, whereby, in accordance with accepted physical principles, a store of heat adequate for any period might have been provided. However a difficulty is raised here by Dr. Croll, in the Philosophical Magazine (May, 1868), where this question is first dealt with, and as this difficulty would seem on examination not to be insurmountable, I venture to call attention to the subject here, more especially as attendant questions of interest would seem to attach to it.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Nature, vol. xvii. p. 206; also Quarterly Journal of Science, July, 1877
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
PRESTON, S. The Age of the Sun's Heat in Relation to Geological Evidence. Nature 17, 423–424 (1878). https://doi.org/10.1038/017423c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/017423c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.