Abstract
YOUR readers may be interested to learn that the light of the comet is by no means strongly polarised. On the 2nd and 4th instant I examined it with a double-image prism, but could not with certainty detect any difference between the brightness of the two images. I also examined it with a plate of right- and left-handed quartz in the principal focus of the 4-inch telescope and a Nicol's prism packed among the lenses of the eyepiece, but could not detect any traces of colour. With a Savant placed between the eyepiece and the eye no bands were delectable. But on the 6th, about midnight, when the comet was shining very brightly, I could perceive a difference in the brightness of the two images with the double-image prism, indicating polarisition in the plane passing through the sun's estimated place. But I was still unable to detect any traces of polarisation either with a Savant or Biquariz, or with a plate cut from a natural crystal of right- and left-handed quartz giving a band across the field in which the two crystals overlap; a form of polariscope which has been found on other occasions very delicate for faint lights.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
RANYARD, A. Coggia's Comet. Nature 10, 184–185 (1874). https://doi.org/10.1038/010184b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/010184b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.