Abstract
MY former letter on this subject was merely to show that, mechanically, Dr. Pettigrew's view of the forward motion or inclination of a bird's wing during the down stroke was less absurd than had been supposed, and even seemed necessary to flight. I did not profess to have made accurate observation or experiment on the point. I accept, therefore, the observation of the Duke of Argyll as to the vertical motion of the heron's wing; but as he expressly refers to its great concavity, that would give a vertical down stroke the effect of a somewhat forward stroke of a flatter wing. The proper inference would therefore seem to be, that in birds with less concave wings the stroke is slightly directed forwards. As to the last two paragraphs of his Grace's letter, he will see, if he refers again to mine, that he has quoted words I never used. I impute to Dr. Pettigrew the “merit of showing” that the “slight upward angle of the mean position of the wing plane is essential to secure horizontal forward motion as a general resultant,” &c., and this is exactly what the Duke denies.
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
WALLACE, A. Animal Locomotion. Nature 9, 403 (1874). https://doi.org/10.1038/009403a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/009403a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.