Abstract
I HAVE to thank Lord Rosse for pointing out an omission in my communication on this subject. It was not, however, an “oversight,” as Lord Rosse supposes, the source of error in question having been duly considered, and its amount calculated, when the experiments were made. It was neglected on account of its smallness. As its theoretical importance is unquestionable, and the amount of experimental error is likely to be much overrated, I gladly supply the following figures, which show that this source of error was fairly negligible.
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
WILLIAMS, W. The Diathermacy of Flame. Nature 7, 46 (1872). https://doi.org/10.1038/007046a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/007046a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.