Abstract
IN NATURE for May 2 Captain Oliver advocates the theory that dolmens are merely the skeletons of original chambered tumuli. This, I think, scarcely agrees with the fact to be observed in the principal dolmens and tumuli of Finistère. In most cases in that department the dolmens occupy situations in every respect similar to those in which the tumuli are found, so that meteorological, and, indeed, every other but human agencies, must have affected both in the same manner and degree. Notwithstanding this, the dolmens are invariably bare, and the kists are as constantly covered—there are no signs of even incipient degradation and denudation in the latter, and none of former covering in the first. It would be unwarrantable to suppose that had the dolmens been uncovered by human beings, no vestiges of the mounds would remain, or that, this perfect and unaccountable removal of material being allowed, the skeleton, i.e., the part containing the most useful stones, should be left unscathed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LEBOUR, G. Brittany Dolmens and Tumuli. Nature 6, 25–26 (1872). https://doi.org/10.1038/006025d0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/006025d0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.