Abstract
I HAVE just read with much interest the paper in NATURE by Mr. W. Saville Kent, criticising my friend Carter's article in the “Annals of Natural History” for this month, in which I fully concur. How Mr. Carter can have fallen into such an error, for such I must call it. I cannot imagine, as comparing a group of animals in Botryllus to those sponge cells, even in so highly a developed form as Grantia. For, taking this as the highest known form of sponge animal, it is at most only a monociliated sac, as shown both by Prof. Clark and by Mr. Carter. Now, it is well known to all investigators, and Mr. Carter has shown it himself, that the animals of Botryllus have distinct oral and fæcal apertures, whereas the sponge cell, so far as has yet been seen, has only an oral aperture. Again, the Ascidian Botryllus is shown to be far higher in the scale when we come to compare its internal organisation, and not merely to confine ourselves to the sac-like tunic. The discharge of the fæcal matter into a common cloacal canal is to me not a sufficient reason for comparing these groups of animals to the sponge animals in Grantia.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
PARFITT, E. Affinities of the Sponges. Nature 4, 201–202 (1871). https://doi.org/10.1038/004201c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/004201c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.