Abstract
Axion insulators possess a quantized axion field θ = π protected by combined lattice and time-reversal symmetry, holding great potential for device applications in layertronics and quantum computing. Here, we propose a high-spin axion insulator (HSAI) defined in large spin-s representation, which maintains the same inherent symmetry but possesses a notable axion field θ = (s + 1/2)2π. Such distinct axion field is confirmed independently by the direct calculation of the axion term using hybrid Wannier functions, layer-resolved Chern numbers, as well as the topological magneto-electric effect. We show that the guaranteed gapless quasi-particle excitation is absent at the boundary of the HSAI despite its integer surface Chern number, hinting an unusual quantum anomaly violating the conventional bulk-boundary correspondence. Furthermore, we ascertain that the axion field θ can be precisely tuned through an external magnetic field, enabling the manipulation of bonded transport properties. The HSAI proposed here can be experimentally verified in ultra-cold atoms by the quantized non-reciprocal conductance or topological magnetoelectric response. Our work enriches the understanding of axion insulators in condensed matter physics, paving the way for future device applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Symmetry plays an essential role in understanding the behavior of condensed materials1,2,3,4. For example, in the presence of time-reversal symmetry, three dimensional insulator typically falls into two categories: one is trivial insulator while the other is topological insulator5,6. These divergent categories can be well described within the framework of the Chern-Simons theory, where the Lagrangian incorporates an additional symmetry allowed term \({{{{{{{{\mathcal{L}}}}}}}}}_{\theta }=\int\,dtd{{{{{{{{\bf{r}}}}}}}}}^{3}\alpha \theta /(4{\pi }^{2}){{{{{{{\bf{E}}}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{{{\bf{B}}}}}}}}\) with E and B the conventional electric and magnetic fields, α the fine structure constant, and θ the gauge dependent axion term7. Because of the 2π periodicity under a gauge transformation8, the axion term here is well defined within the region \((\left[0,\,2\pi \right.)\). Besides, as the quantity E ⋅ B flips sign under time-reversal (\({{{{{{{\mathcal{T}}}}}}}}\)) operation, the axion field manifests only two distinct values, that is, θ = 0 for normal insulator and θ = π for topological insulator7. Furthermore, the non-vanishing axion term in the Lagrangian would introduce additional magneto-electric responses to the Maxwell equations and in turn, results in a distinctive topological magneto-electric effect9,10,11, furnishing a hallmark to the quantized axion field.
In addition to the time-reversal (\({{{{{{{\mathcal{T}}}}}}}}\)) symmetry, the quantized axion field θ = π can also be protected by combined lattice and time-reversal symmetry (for example \({{{{{{{\mathcal{S}}}}}}}}={{{{{{{\mathcal{T}}}}}}}}{\tau }_{1/2}\) with τ1/2 the half translation operator)12, as the quantity E ⋅ B undergoes the same sign reversal. This kind of materials, termed axion insulator13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24, holds significant potential in layertronics25,26,27,28,29 and quantum computing30,31. MnBi2Te4 and its family have recently been proposed as axion insulators in the antiferromagnetic state13,32,33,34,35,36, which finds a concise description with an effective Hamiltonian defined on the orbital and spin-1/2 spaces33. Because the symmetry transformations of high spin representations and spin-1/2 are identical (see Supplementary Table 1), in this work, we generalize this model to other spin species and thus propose a high spin axion insulator (HSAI) preserving the same symmetry. We find that the HSAI with spin-s possesses a notable axion field θHSAI = (s + 1/2)2π. It carries a multiple quantized helical hinge current (QHHC) that is robust against disorders even in the absence of the topologically protected gapless exciations, which contradicts the integer surface Chern number. Consequently, HSAI exhibits an unusual quantum anomaly that violates the conventional bulk-boundary correspondence. In contrast to the case of spin-1/2 axion insulator, the direct calculation of the axion term shows that the large axion field in high-spin case originates mostly from localized surface Wannier functions while, in the bulk, the axion field is either 0 or π. Strikingly, we show that the axion field in HSAI can be tuned precisely by manipulating the magnetic configuration through an external magnetic field, providing a pioneering tuning knob to control the QHHC and the quantized magneto-electric response. Possible experimental realization in ultra-cold atoms is also discussed.
Results
Effective model for the HSAI
Recalling the effective four-band Hamiltonian for the spin-1/2 axion insulator33, we consider a generic model defined on the high spin space which can be expressed as
Here, \({d}_{0,1,2,3}=[\begin{array}{cccc}{m}_{0}-B{k}^{2},&A{k}_{x},&A{k}_{y},&A{k}_{z}\end{array}]\) with A, B, m0 the system parameters. Γ0 = s0 ⊗ τ3 and Γi=1,2,3 = si ⊗ τ1 where si and τi are matrices defined on the high spin space and 2 × 2 orbital space, respectively. The momentum k = (kx, ky, kz) is defined on a cubic lattice with the lattice constant a0 inside the first Brillouin zone. This model Hamiltonian is given directly from the spin-1/2 axion insulator. A construction from symmetry perspective is provided in Supplementary Note 2. It is evident that the first term in Eq. (1) describes a high-spin topological insulator, which preserves both time-reversal (\({{{{{{{\mathcal{T}}}}}}}}\)) and parity (\({{{{{{{\mathcal{P}}}}}}}}\)) symmetries. The second term describes the exchange interaction between topological electrons and normalized magnetic spins \({{{{{{{{\bf{m}}}}}}}}}_{s}=({m}_{s}^{x},\,{m}_{s}^{y},\,{m}_{s}^{z})\) with Δ the exchange strength, resembling that in MnBi2Te4, hence explicitly breaks the time-reversal symmetry while preserves the \({{{{{{{\mathcal{S}}}}}}}}\) symmetry in the infinite size limit along z-direction. We consider the antiferromagnetic phase of an even-layer slab involving only the antiparallel (or canted) spins in the top and bottom layers as illustrated in Fig. 1a, which restores the combined parity and time-reversal (\({{{{{{{\mathcal{PT}}}}}}}}\)) symmetry. Unless otherwise specified, we adopt the typical model parameters as follows: A = m0 = 1, B = Δ = 0.6, a0 = 1.
Figure 1 (b) displays the two dimensional energy spectra of the spin-3/2 HSAI in the absence (blue dashed lines) and presence (red solid lines) of the magnetic exchange term. In the former case, the time-reversal symmetry is present, where the energy spectrum is gapped in the bulk but has two conducting surface states on each side (blue dashed lines). These two surface states can be accurately fitted by a massless Dirac band E1 ~ k and a cubic band E2 ~ k3 (inset in Fig. 1b). Turning on the exchange term in the latter case opens a band gap as indicated by the red solid lines in Fig. 1b. In both cases, the energy spectra are doubly degenerated because of the inherent (\({{{{{{{\mathcal{T}}}}}}}}\) or \({{{{{{{\mathcal{PT}}}}}}}}\)) symmetry.
Layer-resolved Chern number, quantized helical hinge current and quantum anomaly
To explore the topological properties of the HSAI, we calculate the layer-resolved Chern number Cz along \(\hat{z}\)-direction32,37 along with the cumulative Chern number \({\tilde{C}}_{z}=\mathop{\sum }\nolimits_{-{L}_{z}/2}^{z}{C}_{z}\). Given the Chern number C = (s+1/2)2 in odd-layer case38, the system is a high Chern number insulator as shown in Supplementary Note 6. In the even layer system, the opposite layer-resolved Chern numbers are overall confined antisymmetrically inside few surface (top and bottom) layers as shown in Fig. 1c, resulting in a vanishing total Chern number C = 0. Nevertheless, the surface Chern number on one side turns out to be well quantized [\({C}_{surf}^{top(bot)}=\mp 2\)] when s = 3/2 as long as the Fermi level lies inside the energy gap (Fig. 1d). Because the layer-resolved Chern number is related to the axion field through the relation \({\theta }_{HSAI}=({C}_{surf}^{bot}-{C}_{surf}^{top})\pi\)39. The oppositely quantized surface Chern numbers in spin-3/2 HSAI thereby assure a quadruple axion field θHSAI = 4π. Moreover, since the Chern number difference between neighboring top (bottom) and side surfaces is an integer, HSAI supports a possible hinge state that is absent in spin-1/2 axion insulator26,40, which allows a subsequent QHHC owing to opposite chiralities on different surfaces. Nonetheless, we find that this QHHC survives counterintuitively without the existence of any hinge state.
To clarify this, let us first examine the average position 〈z/Lz〉 on the front surface of the slab at y/Ly = − 1/2. The results shown in Fig. 2b reveals two branches (red lines in Fig. 2b) concentrated unexpectedly around the bottom hinge (z/Lz = − 1/2) and propagating rightwards because of the positive group velocity. By contrast, we observe two other branches concentrate oppositely around the top hinge (z/Lz = 1/2), which, simultaneously, propagate leftwards as depicted by the blue lines. Note that only the results for the front surface (at y/Ly = − 1/2) are presented here. In the presence of \({{{{{{{\mathcal{PT}}}}}}}}\) symmetry, the energy spectrum in Fig. 2b is doubly degenerated as stated above. There are four additional branches existing on the other surface at y/Ly = 1/2. Because the wavefunctions on the diagonal hinges are connected by this \({{{{{{{\mathcal{PT}}}}}}}}\) symmetry, they must propagate along the same direction, supporting a helical hinge current.
We then turn to the spectrum density A(kx, E) on a semi-infinite slab41,42,43, where the system extends infinitely along \(+\hat{z}\)-direction but remains unchanged along the lateral directions. A(kx, E) on the front lower hinge illustrated by the blue dashed line in Fig. 2a are plotted in Fig. 2c. It shows that A(kx, E) originates mostly from the right-moving energy bands, agreeing remarkably well with the average position in Fig. 2b. This spectrum density can be verified experimentally by using the nano angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy and microscopy44,45,46. Besides, the high spectrum density on the hinge indicates the presence of a hinge current, the current density of which can be quantitatively determined by26,43
where EF is the Fermi energy labeled by the white line in Fig. 2c, r = (y, z), HHSAI(kx, r) is the Hamiltonian for the HSAI and Gr(EF; kx, r) is the retarded Green’s function.
The upper panel in Fig. 2d presents the hinge current density \({J}_{x}(z)=\mathop{\sum }\nolimits_{y=-{L}_{y}/2}^{0}{j}_{x}({{{{{{{\bf{r}}}}}}}})\) as a function of the layer index z. We see that Jx(z) is verily confined on the hinge, in agreement with 〈z/Lz〉 and A(kx, E). Strikingly, this hinge current decays oscillatively into the side surface, exhibiting a beating mode (magenta line) in sharp contrast to that in spin-1/2 axion insulator26. This peculiar behavior can be quantitatively fitted by the superposition of two power-law decaying edge currents \({J}_{x}^{1}(z)=\frac{{a}_{1}}{\sqrt{z}}\cos (2{k}_{F1}z+{\phi }_{1})\) and \({J}_{x}^{2}(z)=\frac{{a}_{2}}{\sqrt{z}}\cos (2{k}_{F2}z+{\phi }_{2})\)47, where kF1 and kF2 are the Fermi momenta for the two distinct modes marked by the white stars in Fig. 2c, while a1(2) and ϕ1(2) are fitting parameters. The integral of the current density over the layer index provides the current flux \({I}_{x}(z)=\int\nolimits_{0}^{z}d\tilde{z}{J}_{x}(\tilde{z})\) (middle panel in Fig. 2d), which oscillates around 2e/h and coincides perfectly with the fitting data. Additionally, the z-averaged current \(\langle {I}_{x}(z)\rangle=\int\nolimits_{0}^{z}d\tilde{z}{I}_{x}(\tilde{z})/z\) (red line) quantizes to 2e/h only a few layers away from the hinge. Imposing a finite thickness along \(\hat{z}\)-direction enables us to calculate the moving average current \({\langle {I}_{x}(z)\rangle }_{MA}=\int\nolimits_{z-7}^{z+7}d\tilde{z}{J}_{x}(\tilde{z})\). The result displayed in the bottom panel demonstrates a helical hinge current quantized precisely to ± 2e/h. Although the HSAI supports a QHHC identical to its integer surface Chern number, the topologically protected gapless exciations in lower dimension are completely absent as plotted in Fig. 2b. It worths note that the energy gap in Fig. 2b may be induced by the finite size effect. Our analysis in Supplementary Note 3 shows that the size dependence of the energy gap comes from the bulk bands, which demonstrates that this energy gap originates from the magnetic exchange interaction. Consequently, the conventional bulk-boundary correspondence that an integer Chern number must hold chiral edge states fails in HSAI, establishing an unusual quantum anomaly.
Non-reciprocal conductance
Owing to the chirality bonded to the quantized surface Chern number, this QHHC can be unveiled by the non-reciprocal conductance \({G}_{ij}^{N}={G}_{ij}-{G}_{ji}\) in a six-terminal device sketched in Fig. 2e, where Gij is the differential conductance26,48. In this device, two longitudinal leads (terminals 5 and 6) are intimately connected to the two ends of the sample while four transverse leads (terminals 1, 2, 3, and 4) are attached to different hinges on the front surface. Figure 2f shows three representative non-reciprocal conductances versus the Fermi energy EF in the clean limit (solid lines), with non-magnetic Anderson disorder (dashed lines) and with magnetic Anderson disorder (dashed dotted lines). In general, \({G}_{65}^{N}=0\), \({G}_{31}^{N}=-2{e}^{2}/h\) and \({G}_{42}^{N}=2{e}^{2}/h\) when the Fermi level lies inside the band gap for all three cases, consistent with the current distribution in Fig. 2d as well as the layer-resolved Chern numbers in Fig. 1d. This verifies that the QHHC is topological protected as the quantized non-reciprocal conductance is immune to both non-magnetic and magnetic Anderson disorders that even breaks the global \({{{{{{{\mathcal{PT}}}}}}}}\) symmetry5,6.
Since multiple frequency ac current is robust against ambient perturbation, to detect this QHHC, we employ an alternate detection in which terminals 2, 4, 5, and 6 are grounded whereas a harmonic voltage \(V(t)={V}_{0}\sin ({\omega }_{0}t)\) with a periodicity T = 2π/ω0 is applied alternatively to terminal 1 or 3 as illustrated in Fig. 2g. During the first (second) half period, a positive (negative) voltage is applied to terminal 1 (3) as an input while the current flows i3(t) [i1(t)] from terminal 3 (1) is detected as an output. Their combination gives rise to an asymmetric net current i(t) = i1(t) + i3(t) as shown in Fig. 2h. Performing a Fourier transform converts i(t) into I(ω). The non-reciprocal conductance can then be determined from the equation \(F(\omega )=| I(\omega )({\omega }^{2}-{\omega }_{0}^{2})| /(2N{\omega }_{0}{V}_{0})\) with N the number of periodicity (see Supplementary Note 4 for details). The result displayed in Fig. 2i shows that \(F(\omega )={G}_{13}^{N}\) when ω = 2ω0. Thus, non-reciprocal conductance measurements offer a reliable experimental method to visualize the QHHC in HSAI.
Axion term
The HSAI can alternatively be characterized by the axion term7, which can be evaluated directly from the hybrid Wannier functions (HWFs) constructed in terms of the Bloch wavefunctions49. In this scenario, the axion term on a slab is defined as49
where znk is the hybrid Wannier charge center along \(\hat{z}\)-direction and \({\tilde{\Omega }}_{{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}nn}^{xy}\) is corresponding non-Abelian Berry curvature.
Figure 3 (a) shows znk in the first Brillouin zone for a six-layer HSAI with spin-3/2. These znk consist of two different types, those localized on the top and bottom surfaces as emphasized by the red and blue lines and those extending into the bulk denoted by black lines. Those surface Wannier bands will disappear under a periodic boundary condition when connecting the top and bottom surfaces. The total axion term of the slab can subsequently be divided into two parts \({\theta }_{CS}^{slab}={\theta }_{CS}^{bulk}+{\theta }_{CS}^{surf}\) with \({\theta }_{CS}^{bulk}\) and \({\theta }_{CS}^{surf}\) the axion terms corresponding to the surface and bulk HWFs. The bulk axion term \({\theta }_{CS}^{bulk}\) is identical to that obtained analytically from the Chern-Simons three form in the infinite size limit49. In Fig. 3b, we show \({\theta }_{CS}^{bulk}\) (red upside down triangle), \({\theta }_{CS}^{surf}\) (black circle) together with \({\theta }_{CS}^{slab}\) (blue triangle) versus the inverse thickness 1/Lz. There are three distinctive features in this figure. First, the total axion term shows an obvious tendency quantized to \({\theta }_{CS}^{slab}=4\pi\) when the system size approaches infinity (1/Lz → 0), which confirms the quadruple axion term in two dimensional HSAI slab. Second, the axion term originates completely from the surface HWFs although the bulk HWFs also result in a small value that decreases \({\theta }_{CS}^{bulk}\) at finite size. Third, the axion term \({\theta }_{CS}^{surf}\) obeys the relation \({\theta }_{CS}^{surf}=({C}_{HWF}^{bot}-{C}_{HWF}^{top})\pi\) in the infinite size limit, where \({C}_{HWF}^{top(bot)}\) is the top (bottom) surface Chern number obtained from the surface HWFs as indicated by cyan diamond (magenta square). These peculiar results reaffirm the unusual quantum anomaly and also the quadruple axion term θHSAI = 4π in HSAI with spin-3/2.
Topological magneto-electric effect
Such quadruple axion term implies a unique topological magneto-electric effect13,32. When applying a magnetic field Bz to the HSAI along \(\hat{z}\)-direction, the Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) acquires a Peierls phase32, which redistributes the electron charge Q(z) in accordance to the confined layer-resolved Chern number Cz as shown in Fig. 3c. The ensuing charge polarization \(P=\sum\nolimits_{z=-{L}_{z}/2}^{{L}_{z}/2}zQ(z)/{L}_{z}\) almost quantizes to P ≈ 4αϕ, where α is the fine structure constant and ϕ is the total magnetic flux penetrating the HSAI slab. In comparison, a quantized orbital magnetization can emerge under an external electric field Ez when incurring a potential drop δU = eEzLz in the HSAI Hamiltonian50. The red square in Fig. 3(d) shows the orbital magnetization M as a function of δU, which agrees quantitatively well with the ideal case benchmarked by the black line. These two results independently certify the quadruple axion term θHSAI in spin-3/2 HSAI. The slight deviation from the exactly quadruple value originates from the finite size effect, which is further revealed by the size scalings of the axion term \({\theta }_{CS}^{slab}/\pi\), polarization coefficient P/(αϕ), and magnetization coefficient M/(αδU) against the inverse layer thickness 1/Lz in Fig. 3e. We also evaluate the axion term and the surface Chern numbers for spin-5/2 HSAI in terms of the HWFs (Fig. 3f). The results displayed in Fig. 3g demonstrate that spin-5/2 HSAI possesses a surface Chern number \({C}_{HWF}^{top(bot)}=\mp 4\), a total axion term \({\theta }_{CS}^{slab}=9\pi\), a surface axion term \({\theta }_{CS}^{surf}=8\pi\) and a bulk axion term \({\theta }_{CS}^{bulk}=\pi\). Systematic results for the spin-5/2 HSAI are provided in Supplementary Note 5. The topological properties for HSAI with different spin species are summarized in Table 1, giving a distinct axion field θ = (s+1/2)2π and \({C}_{surf}^{top/bot}=\mp (1/2+3/2+\cdots+s)\).
Tunable topological phase transition
In the presence of an in-plane magnetic field, the antiparallel magnetic moments in the top and bottom layers become canted with the canting angle γ proportional to the magnetic field strength as illustrated in Fig. 4a. In this case, the quantized axion field in the infinite size limit is protected by \({m}_{x}{{{{{{{\mathcal{P}}}}}}}}\) symmetry where mx is the mirror plane normal to x-direction. In Fig. 4b, we compare two dimensional band gaps as functions of γ for spin-1/2 axion insulator and spin-3/2 HSAI. Because the exchange gap is determined by the perpendicular magnetization Mz, the band gap for spin-1/2 axion insulator decreases monotonically as γ is enlarged and finally becomes zero when γ = π/2. On the contrary, the band for spin-3/2 HSAI exhibits a gap close at γ = π/4 as shown in Fig. 4c, suggesting a possible topological phase transition. Indeed, Fig. 4e shows that the surface Chern number obtained using both the Bloch wavefunctions and the HWFs(Fig. 4d) changes from + 2 ( − 2) to + 1 ( − 1) when γ = π/4. At this point, the HWFs are connected at the Γ point (Fig. 4d), therefore the Berry curvature and the surface Chern number can transfer from one side to the other51, leading to an axionic phase transition. Such topological phase transition is further affirmed by the axion field, the polarization and magnetization coefficients shown in Fig. 4f.
Discussion
The device application of axion insulators requires the fine-control of the transport signals such as the magneto-electric response or the QHHC, which are identical to the axion field. In spin-1/2 axion insulators, the axion term cannot be tuned without disrupting the existing \({{{{{{{\mathcal{S}}}}}}}}\) symmetry or refabricating the setup52. Nevertheless, because different surface bands shown in Fig. 1b can be coupled via the in-plane exchange interaction (Mxsx ⊗ τ0), an apparent topological phase transition between axion insulators with different axion fields occurs in the HSAI. Consequently, the axion term θHSAI (in unit of π), hence the QHHC \({G}_{ij}^{N}\) (in unit of e2/2h) and the magneto-electric effect P/(αB) [M/(αE)] in HSAI can be precisely adjusted from 4 to 2 via the application of an external magnetic field. Thus, our work opens up an exciting possibility for the groundbreaking advancement in the practical application of axion insulators.
In conclusion, we have proposed a HSAI defined on the high spin space and shown that this HSAI possesses a multiple axion field protected by the combined lattice and time-reversal symmetry. Notably, the axion term in the bulk of a HSAI still quantizes to θ = 0 or θ = π while the surface of HSAI possesses a large axion term and a consistent integer Chern number, which can be tuned by manipulating the magnetic configuration through an external magnetic field. These results extend the scope of recently discovered axion insulator in magnetic topological materials. In ultra-cold fermions on a honeycomb lattice, the exchange gap can be introduced by complex next-nearest-neighbour tunneling terms through circular modulation of the lattice position53. We thus propose that our theory can be tested in high spin ultra-cold fermions on a stacked honeycomb lattice, where the non-reciprocal conductance can be detected by the orthogonal drifts analogous to a Hall current under a constant force to the atoms53,54.
Methods
Caltulations of the layer-resolved Chern number, magnetization, and polarization
In a HSAI slab with periodic boundary conditions along the lateral dimensions, the momenta kx and ky are good quantum numbers because of the translation symmetry. Therefore, the layer-resolved Chern number can be calculated by projecting the total Chern number into specific layer, which can be written as
Here, EF is the Fermi energy, Em(n)(k) is the eigenenergy of HHSAI with \(\left\vert {m}_{{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}}\right\rangle\) (\(\left\vert {n}_{{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}}\right\rangle\)) the corresponding eigenstates, \({\hat{P}}_{z}=\left\vert {\psi }_{z}\right\rangle \left\langle {\psi }_{z}\right\vert\) is the projecting operator. The integral is performed inside the first Brillouin zone.
Under an electric field Ez along \(\hat{z}\)-direction, a potential drop occurs inside the HSAI slab along the same direction. The onsite energy in each layer acquires an additional value eEzz with z the layer index and the total potential drop in the HSAI slab is δU = eEzLz. The orbital magnetization can then be obtained accordingly by using
where \({\tilde{H}}_{HSAI}={H}_{HSAI}+e{E}_{z}z\) with \({\tilde{E}}_{m(n)}\) and \(\left\vert \tilde{m}\right\rangle\) (\(\left\vert \tilde{n}\right\rangle\)) its eigenenergy and eigenstate, respectively.
Applying a magnetic field Bz along \(\hat{z}\)-direction introduces a gauge potential to the HSAI lattice and thus breaks the in-plane translation symmetry. Inside each unit cell, HSAI acquires a gauge field ϕ0 = ∫drA ⋅ r/Ψ0 with Ψ0 = h/(2e) the magnetic flux quantum. The total magnetic flux penetrating the HSAI slab is ϕ = BzLxLy. We adopt the Landau gauge A = (−yBz, 0, 0), so the translation symmetry along \(\hat{y}\)-direction is broken while that along \(\hat{x}\)-direction sustains. In this case, the charge distribution induced by the magnetic field can be obtained by using the Green’s function method, yielding
where r = (x,y,z) and the Green’s function \({G}^{r}(E,{{{{{{{\bf{r}}}}}}}})={(E+i\eta -{H}_{HSAI})}^{-1}\) with η the imaginary line width function. On the other hand, as kx is still a good quantum number, the charge distribution along \(\hat{z}\)-direction can be alternatively obtained by using
Moreover, because only the negative charge originating from electrons are considered here in Eqs. (6) and (7), to derive the unbalanced charge distribution and in turn the polarization, the uniform background charge compensating the positive ions in the lattice has to be removed from the results, which has the form \({q}_{back}=-\mathop{\sum }\nolimits_{z=-{L}_{z}/2}^{{L}_{z}/2}q(z)/{L}_{z}\) because of the charge conservation. As a result, the charge distribution has the form Q(z) = q(z) + qback. The charge polarization can finally be expressed as \(P=\mathop{\sum }\nolimits_{z=-{L}_{z}/2}^{{L}_{z}/2}zQ(z)/{L}_{z}\).
Caltulations of the axion term using the hybrid Wannier function
In a HSAI slab, the hybrid Wannier wavefunction \(\left\vert {h}_{n,{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}}\right\rangle\) can be constructed from the Bloch wave function. We thus have \(\left\vert {h}_{n,{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}}\right\rangle=1/2\pi \int\nolimits_{-\pi }^{\pi }d{k}_{z}\left\vert {n}_{{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}}\right\rangle {e}^{-i({{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{{{\bf{r}}}}}}}}+{k}_{z}z)}\). In this case, the hybrid Wannier charge center takes the form \({z}_{{n}_{{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}}}=\langle {h}_{n,{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}}| z| {h}_{n,{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}}\rangle\)49. To calculate the non-Abelian Berry curvature, we divide the two-dimensional Brillouin zone into a regular mesh with bx and by being the primitive reciprocal vectors that define the mesh. Then the gauge covariant Berry curvature has the form55
where \(\left\vert {\tilde{\partial }}_{i}{h}_{n,{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}}\right\rangle=(\left\vert {\tilde{h}}_{n,{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}+{b}_{i}}\right\rangle -\left\vert {\tilde{h}}_{n,{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}-{b}_{i}}\right\rangle )/2\). The wavefunctions constructed by a linear combination of the occupied bands at neighboring mesh point are \(\left\vert {\tilde{h}}_{n,{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}\pm {b}_{i}}\right\rangle={\sum }_{{n}^{{\prime} }}{({S}_{{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}},{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}\pm {b}_{i}}^{nn{\prime} })}^{-1}\)\(\times \left\vert {h}_{{n}^{{\prime} },{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}\pm {b}_{i}}\right\rangle\), where the matrix \({S}_{{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}},{{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}}^{{\prime} }}^{nn{\prime} }=\langle {h}_{n,{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}}| {h}_{{n}^{{\prime} },{{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}}^{{\prime} }}\rangle\).
Green’s function method for calculating the differential conductance G ij
The differential conductance Gij corresponds to the transmission coefficient Tij from terminal j to terminal i, which can be derived by using the non-equilibrium Green’s function method. Based on the Landauer-Büttiker formula48, the transmission coefficient Tij can be expressed as \({T}_{ij}={{{{{{{\rm{Tr}}}}}}}}[{\Gamma }_{i}{G}^{r}{\Gamma }_{j}{G}^{a}]\), where \({\Gamma }_{i(j)}=i[{\Sigma }_{i(j)}-{\Sigma }_{i(j)}^{{{{\dagger}}} }]\) is the line width function and \({G}^{r}={({G}^{a})}^{{{{\dagger}}} }={[{E}_{F}+i\eta -{H}_{HSAI}-{\sum }_{i}{\Sigma }_{i}]}^{-1}\) with EF the Fermi energy, η the imaginary line width function and Σi the self energy due to the coupling to terminal i. To incorporate the disorders, we generate random potentials δE ∈ ( − W/2, W/2) for the non-magnetic Anderson disorders or δMz ∈ ( − Wz/2, Wz/2) for magnetic Anderson disorders at each site r, then add these random potentials to the Hamiltonian in the Green’s functions. The results in the presence of disorders are calculated under 10 times average (Fig. 2f).
Data availability
The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
The code that is deemed central to the conclusions is available at https://doi.org/10.24433/CO.7892923.v1.
References
El-Batanouny, M. & Wooten, F. Symmetry and Condensed Matter Physics: A Computational Approach Vol. 936, (Cambridge University Press, 2008).
Goldhaber, A. et al. Symmetry and Modern Physics Vol. 304 (World Scientific, 2003).
Zee, A. Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics Revised Vol. 48 (Princeton University Press, 2015).
McGreevy, J. Generalized symmetries in condensed matter. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 57–82 (2023).
Qi, X.-L. & Zhang, S.-C. Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057–1110 (2011).
Hasan, M. Z. & Kane, C. L. Colloquium: topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045–3067 (2010).
Qi, X.-L., Hughes, T. L. & Zhang, S.-C. Topological field theory of time-reversal invariant insulators. Phys. Rev. B 78, 195424 (2008).
Vazifeh, M. M. & Franz, M. Quantization and 2π periodicity of the axion action in topological insulators. Phys. Rev. B 82, 233103 (2010).
Armitage, N. P. & Wu, L. On the matter of topological insulators as magnetoelectrics. SciPost Physics 6, 046 (2019).
Litvinov, V. Magnetism in Topological insulators, Pages 79–87 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020).
Planelles, J. Axion electrodynamics in topological insulators for beginners. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.07290 (2021).
Varnava, N. & Vanderbilt, D. Surfaces of axion insulators. Phys. Rev. B 98, 245117 (2018).
Wan, Y., Li, J. & Liu, Q. Topological magnetoelectric response in ferromagnetic axion insulators. Natl Sci. Rev. 11, nwac138 (2022).
Sekine, A. & Nomura, K. Axion electrodynamics in topological materials. J. Appl. Phys.129, 141101 (2021).
Zhao, Y. & Liu, Q. Routes to realize the axion-insulator phase in \({{{\mbox{MnBi}}}}_{2}{{{\mbox{Te}}}}_{4}{({{{\mbox{Bi}}}}_{2}{{{\mbox{Te}}}}_{3})}_{n}\) family. Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 060502 (2021).
Tokura, Y., Yasuda, K. & Tsukazaki, A. Magnetic topological insulators. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 126–143 (2019).
Nenno, D. M., Garcia, C. A. C., Gooth, J., Felser, C. & Narang, P. Axion physics in condensed-matter systems. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 682–696 (2020).
Wang, J., Lian, B., Qi, X.-L. & Zhang, S.-C. Quantized topological magnetoelectric effect of the zero-plateau quantum anomalous hall state. Phys. Rev. B 92, 081107 (2015).
Morimoto, T., Furusaki, A. & Nagaosa, N. Topological magnetoelectric effects in thin films of topological insulators. Phys. Rev. B 92, 085113 (2015).
Mogi, M. et al. A magnetic heterostructure of topological insulators as a candidate for an axion insulator. Nat. Mater. 16, 516–521 (2017).
Xiao, D. et al. Realization of the axion insulator state in quantum anomalous hall sandwich heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 056801 (2018).
Xu, Y., Song, Z., Wang, Z., Weng, H. & Dai, X. Higher-order topology of the axion insulator EuIn2As2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 256402 (2019).
Wang, Z., Wieder, B. J., Li, J., Yan, B. & Bernevig, B. A. Higher-order topology, monopole nodal lines, and the origin of large fermi arcs in transition metal dichalcogenides XTe2 (X = Mo,W). Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 186401 (2019).
Lin, K.-S. et al. Spin-resolved topology and partial axion angles in three-dimensional insulators. Nat. Commun. 15, 550 (2024).
Gao, A. et al. Layer hall effect in a 2d topological axion antiferromagnet. Nature 595, 521–525 (2021).
Gong, M., Liu, H., Jiang, H., Chen, C.-Z. & Xie, X.-C. Half-quantized helical hinge currents in axion insulators. Natl Sci. Rev. 10, nwad025 (2023).
Chen, R. et al. Layer Hall effect induced by hidden Berry curvature in antiferromagnetic insulators. Natl Sci. Rev. 11, nwac140 (2022).
Dai, W.-B., Li, H., Xu, D.-H., Chen, C.-Z. & Xie, X. C. Quantum anomalous layer hall effect in the topological magnet MnBi2Te4. Phys. Rev. B 106, 245425 (2022).
Li, S., Gong, M., Cheng, S., Jiang, H. & Xie, X. C. Dissipationless layertronics in axion insulator MnBi2Te4. Natl Sci. Rev. 11, 6 (2023).
Allen, M. et al. Visualization of an axion insulating state at the transition between 2 chiral quantum anomalous hall states. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 14511–14515 (2019).
Yan, Q., Li, H., Zeng, J., Sun, Q.-F. & Xie, X. C. A Majorana perspective on understanding and identifying axion insulators. Commun. Phys. 4, 239 (2021).
Li, Y.-H. & Cheng, R. Identifying axion insulator by quantized magnetoelectric effect in antiferromagnetic MnBi2Te4 tunnel junction. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L022067 (2022).
Zhang, D. et al. Topological axion states in the magnetic insulator MnBi2Te4 with the quantized magnetoelectric effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 206401 (2019).
Li, J. et al. Intrinsic magnetic topological insulators in van der Waals layered MnBi2Te4-family materials. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw5685 (2019).
Liu, C. et al. Robust axion insulator and chern insulator phases in a two-dimensional antiferromagnetic topological insulator. Nat. Mater. 19, 522–527 (2020).
Otrokov, M. M. et al. Prediction and observation of an antiferromagnetic topological insulator. Nature 576, 416–422 (2019).
Wang, H.-W., Fu, B. & Shen, S.-Q. Helical symmetry breaking and quantum anomaly in massive Dirac fermions. Phys. Rev. B 104, L241111 (2021).
Lin, W. et al. Direct visualization of edge state in even-layer MnBi2Te4 at zero magnetic field. Nat. Commun. 13, 7714 (2022).
Essin, A. M., Moore, J. E. & Vanderbilt, D. Magnetoelectric polarizability and axion electrodynamics in crystalline insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 146805 (2009).
Schindler, F., Tsirkin, S. S., Neupert, T., Andrei Bernevig, B. & Wieder, B. J. Topological zero-dimensional defect and flux states in three-dimensional insulators. Nat. Commun. 13, 5791 (2022).
Gu, M. et al. Spectral signatures of the surface anomalous hall effect in magnetic axion insulators. Nat. Commun. 12, 3524 (2021).
Yue, C. et al. Symmetry-enforced chiral hinge states and surface quantum anomalous hall effect in the magnetic axion insulator Bi2−xSmxSe3. Nat. Phys. 15, 577–581 (2019).
Chu, R.-L., Shi, J. & Shen, S.-Q. Surface edge state and half-quantized hall conductance in topological insulators. Phys. Rev. B 84, 085312 (2011).
Cattelan, M. & Fox, N. A. A perspective on the application of spatially resolved arpes for 2d materials. Nanomaterials 8, 284 (2018).
Iwasawa, H. High-resolution angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy and microscopy. Electronic Struct. 2, 043001 (2020).
Brown, L. et al. Polycrystalline graphene with single crystalline electronic structure. Nano lett. 14, 5706–5711 (2014).
Zou, J.-Y., Fu, B., Wang, H.-W., Hu, Z.-A. & Shen, S.-Q. Half-quantized hall effect and power law decay of edge-current distribution. Phys. Rev. B 105, L201106 (2022).
Datta, S. Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems Vol. 393 (Cambridge University Press, 1995).
Varnava, N., Souza, I. & Vanderbilt, D. Axion coupling in the hybrid wannier representation. Phys. Rev. B 101, 155130 (2020).
Thonhauser, T., Ceresoli, D., Vanderbilt, D. & Resta, R. Orbital magnetization in periodic insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 137205 (2005).
Olsen, T., Taherinejad, M., Vanderbilt, D. & Souza, I. Surface theorem for the chern-simons axion coupling. Phys. Rev. B 95, 075137 (2017).
Coh, S., Vanderbilt, D., Malashevich, A. & Souza, I. Chern-simons orbital magnetoelectric coupling in generic insulators. Phys. Rev. B 83, 085108 (2011).
Jotzu, G. et al. Experimental realization of the topological Haldane model with ultracold fermions. Nature 515, 237–240 (2014).
Brantut, J.-P., Meineke, J., Stadler, D., Krinner, S. & Esslinger, T. Conduction of ultracold fermions through a mesoscopic channel. Science 337, 1069–1071 (2012).
Ceresoli, D., Thonhauser, T., Vanderbilt, D. & Resta, R. Orbital magnetization in crystalline solids: multi-band insulators, chern insulators, and metals. Phys. Rev. B 74, 024408 (2006).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the fruitful discussions with Dr. Zhiqiang Zhang and Prof. Chui-Zhen Chen. H.J. acknowledges the support from the National Key R&D Program of China (Grants No. 2019YFA0308403 and No. 2022YFA1403700) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12350401). Y.-H.L acknowledges the support from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. X.C.X. acknowledges the support from the Innovation Program for Quantum Science and Technology (Grant No. 2021ZD0302400).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.J. conceived the idea of high spin axion insulators after a discussion with Y.-H.L. and X.C.X. S.L. performed calculations with assistance from M.G., Y.-H.L. and H.J. S.L. and Y.-H.L. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors. H.J. and X.C.X. supervised the project.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Huahua Fu and Rafael Gonzalez-Hernandez for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, S., Gong, M., Li, YH. et al. High spin axion insulator. Nat Commun 15, 4250 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48542-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48542-4
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.